Tag Archives: long term care insurance

Pending insurance policy price changes create urgency (in some situations) to act now

Insurance actuaries have a difficult job. They must combine a number of factors—information about purchasers, economic health, product attributes and competitive pricing – to price policies so they are attractive for purchasers and generate profit for the insurance company.

Recent history suggests that many actuaries underestimated two important factors – persistently low interest rates and increased longevity – when they priced Universal Life insurance and Long Term Care insurance for women. This is leading to changes in pricing.

Universal Life Changes

In a recent blog post, author Michael Kitces reviewed some changes in Universal Life Insurance that have occurred as a result of low interest rates and new government actuarial guidelines. “The National Association of Insurance Commissioners has created new reserve requirements for universal life policies that offer so-called “secondary guarantees” (also called “no lapse guarantees”) — which guarantee that the policy will remain in force, for life or a specified period of time, as long as any required ongoing premiums are paid, even if the cash value turns out to be insufficient to maintain the policy.” These new reserve requirements are being implemented over the next few weeks.

Because interest rates have been so low for so long, most universal life policy issuers have either stopped writing new policies, or have (or soon will) increased their pricing on new policies that they issue. These price increases could be in effect early next year. Some of these insurance carriers are even lowering the annual interest credit that they pay on existing policies to very low levels.

Not all universal life companies have completed the process of raising their prices on new policies. If you need a permanent policy with a “no lapse guarantee” then it would be worth a call to an insurance agent to see if you could purchase a policy before these new reserve requirements are implemented.

Long Term Care Policies for Single Women

According to an AARP Public Policy Institute Fact Sheet on Long Term Care (LTC) insurance, 64% of the LTC benefits paid out in 2010 went to women.  Single women with health conditions represent the group with the highest incidence of LTC usage.

To begin to better reflect this reality, the largest LTC provider, Genworth Financial, is changing the way that it prices its LTC policies. In the past, Genworth used a unisex rating table to price LTC for new customers. Starting in January, they will make a variety of changes to their LTC offerings to make them more profitable. Among these are:

  • Charge different annual premiums for women and men.
  • Introduce new blood tests that are currently used for life insurance underwriting for new policy holders.
  • Use lower investment return assumptions for policy premiums to more realistically reflect today’s interest rate environment.

These changes may end up being copied by other LTC carriers, so if you are a single woman it may make sense to buy a policy as soon as possible.

~ Allyn Hughes, CFP®, CLU®, ChFC® – Brooks, Hughes & Jones – Partners in Wealth Management – Tacoma, WA

www.BHJadvisors.com

If you liked this post, please share it

Can you afford to self insure against the risk of needing long-term care?

For many people, their financial security in retirement could hinge on a potentially expensive need for long-term care.

The decision of whether or not to protect against this risk through the purchase of long-term care insurance is a very important consideration for most people in their late 50s and early 60s.

Some affluent people can clearly self insure this risk, setting aside savings or investments to cover potential future costs. But there are many people who are squarely in between a clear ability to self-insure and a clear need to purchase insurance.

If you are deciding whether or not you can afford to self insure against the potential need for long-term care, there is a calculator that does a nice job of estimating the potential expense that you could face and how much you would need to save to overcome that expense.

The calculator available here starts with default entry points but you can change them to reflect your situation and other assumptions.

For instance, you’ll see a default annual cost of long-term care of $50,000. This figure may be applicable to in-home care and assisted living but more comprehensive nursing home care costs $80,000+ on average in Washington state. Another variable to change is inflation of long-term care costs. General cost of living may rise about 3% per year but health care costs increase faster. It’s better to enter 5% inflation if you are below age 70. If you are much above age 75, then a 3% inflation level should suffice. The length of long-term care need is a significant wild card in this equation. The average nursing home stay is 2.4 years and the average person entering a nursing home is 79 years old. Of course, you probably have a relative or acquaintance who spent many more years in a facility, particularly if memory care was needed.

Given a certain set of assumptions, let’s look at how much you would need to save to self insure a future need for long-term care.

This scenario produced the following outcome:

“Your future long-term care needs total $324,139. You have available assets of $10,000. To self-insure you will need to save $10,505 per year increasing at 0.0%, or, you can set aside a lump sum of $122,356 today and let it accumulate interest until needed. Alternatively, you could consider purchasing a long-term care insurance policy to cover the potential future expenses.”

You’ll notice that because of the annual inflation of LTC expenses, today’s $75,000 per year becomes $158,503 in 18 years when the hypothetical LTC event occurs.

Of course, you can change the variables to do some “what if?” calculations of your own.

The alternative to saving $10,505 per year in this instance would be to purchase long-term care insurance with enough benefit to cover much of the potential costs. The long-term care premium would be less than the $10,505 per year in invested savings. Premium rates differ based on age at the date of application, overall health and the amount of coverage purchased. In general, a relatively healthy couple in their early 60s could obtain three years of coverage at $150 per day with 3% compound inflation, 90-day elimination period for around $3,500 per year. Premiums are generally less expensive the earlier you apply if you are healthy. There are many ailments and conditions that can show up between 55 and 65 that cause the cost of policies to climb the longer you wait.

The premium would rise over time at different rates depending on the claims history of all of the people who purchased the same policy.

If you never qualify for long-term care or have only a brief need, your premiums would not be recovered. Alternatively, your own savings intended to self insure would be available to you for other goals or to bequest to your heirs.

In many cases, when long-term care is needed – particularly expensive nursing home care or full-time care in your own home – the cost of the LTC insurance could be more than offset by the benefits paid out in less than two years.

It’s an important consideration. Even if self insurance is the answer, that conclusion should only be reached after thorough review of the pros and cons in the context of your overall financial plan.

For more information about recent changes and challenges of the long-term care insurance industry, please read this article I wrote in the Tacoma News Tribune August 1.

To do:

  • Use the calculator to determine what you may need to save in order to be able to self insure your long-term care needs.
  • Determine if you are healthy enough to qualify for a long-term care policy.  Most LTC insurance carriers will not accept people who have heart issues, diabetes cancers or other conditions that would make them more likely to become disabled.
  • If you are healthy enough, then contact your financial professional to get a quote for this insurance.

~ Gary Brooks, CFP® — Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

www.BHJadvisors.com

If you liked this post, please share it

Long-term care costs … still expensive, but growing slower in some cases

The cost of long-term health care services has historically advanced at a fast pace. When we consider long-term care costs and insurance policies in our comprehensive financial plans, we assume those costs will double general inflation and grow approximately 6% per year.

According to Genworth’s 2012 Cost of Care Survey, long-term care expenses have moderated a bit for in-home care and nursing home care. These costs have lessened moreso nationwide than in Washington state, however.

Some interesting numbers courtesy of the Genworth study, as relayed by the South Sound Business Examiner:

  • Most people prefer in-home care whenever possible. The cost of in-home health aide services in Washington has risen only slightly over the past five years. As the need for these services has grown, competition to provide service has increased keeping prices in check.
  • Nationally, the median hourly cost for home health aide services is $19. In Washington it is $22 per hour. The cost reflects an increase of less than 1% over the past five years.
  • The median annual cost for care in an assisted living facility is $39,600 nationally. The comparable cost in Washington is $51,000. The national yearly cost for assisted living has increased 5.7% a year over the past five years, while long-term care costs in Washington have increased 7.2% a year during the same time period.
  • Nationally, the median annual cost for a private nursing home room rose 4.3% annually over the past five years to $81,030, while costs in Washington increased 4.6% a year during the comparable time period to $96,842.

While competition has grown due to demand for these services, insuring against the risk of long-term care expenses has gotten a little less competitive. Two years ago, MetLife exited the LTC insurance business. This year, Prudential followed. Because more claims have been filed on LTC insurance policies, the business is less profitable than some insurers would like it to be. Others that have not left the business have revised their pricing significantly.

It’s important to think about the critical role that health care expenses play in your overall financial security. In many cases, protecting against the risk of large expenses is a wise move. Long-term care insurance policies can be designed with many different variables that impact the price and the coverage. It’s important to design coverage that fits with your overall financial plan.

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

If you liked this post, please share it

Retirement reality: when is not always your choice

Interesting chart here from the Employee Benefits Research Institute analyzing the frequency at which people are able to retire on their own terms compared to those who have been forced to retire earlier or later than planned.

Twenty years of survey data suggests that people retire about when they plan to 48% of the time. More than 42% of retirees on average over the past two decades have retired earlier than planned. And only 5% of those retiring early offered positive reasons for their decision, indicating that they could afford to do it. Over half of early retirees were forced to due to health or disability. It’s not always their own health. Many cases include children who retire in order to provide full-time care for a parent who does not have long-term care insurance or adequate retirement income.

MetLife’s Mature Market Institute indicates that the percentage of adults providing care to a parent has tripled since 1994.

“Nearly 10 million adult children over the age of 50 care for their aging parents,” said Sandra Timmermann, Ed.D., director of the MetLife Mature Market Institute. “Assessing the long-term financial impact of caregiving for aging parents on caregivers themselves, especially those who must curtail their working careers to do so, is especially important, since it can jeopardize their future financial security.”

Research suggests that the cost impact on the individual female caregiver in terms of lost wages and Social Security benefits equals $324,044. Leaving the labor force early because of caregiving responsibilities equated to $142,693 of lost wages. The estimated impact of caregiving on lost Social Security benefits is $131,351. A very conservative estimated impact on pensions is approximately $50,000. Men forced to retire early to become caregivers forgo approximately $283,176 of earnings and retirement income.

What financial planning and life planning decisions are you making to increase the probability that you’ll be able to retire on your terms?

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

If you liked this post, please share it

Long-term care insurance rate increases vary

Gary Brooks’s monthly column in The News Tribune on Dec. 1 highlighted changes in the long-term care insurance industry. Insurance companies are raising premiums and MetLife will stop taking new applications at the end of the year.

You can read the article here.

An interesting follow-up highlighting a real-life example comes from Brooks, Hughes & Jones partner Nancy Jones.

I purchased an LTC policy 10 years ago from Genworth Insurance. The premium has not changed. It has been $2,795 each year. If the policy premium had increased with a general inflation factor of 3% annually, the premium would now be $3,756.

If Genworth policies increase by 18%, as suggested in the article, my premium would become $3,298. This is less than it would be if it had simply increased at an inflation rate of 3%.  It is important to me that the insurer price this product in such a way that the benefit will be able to be paid if and when I need it in the future.  If my premium goes up by 18%, I’ll consider that very fair.

Stay tuned.  I’ll let you know what the new premium is when my renewal is due next year.

Of course, the history of premium increases varies from one insurer to the next and one rating class to the next. Someone with a standard rating instead of preferred, may have had a different experience with rate increases.

~ Gary Brooks, CFP®, Allyn Hughes, CFP®, and Nancy Jones, CFP®, — Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

If you liked this post, please share it