The deleveraging divergence

Back in 2008 when it entered our vocabulary, The Economist called deleveraging “a fate worse than debt.” The process of reducing leverage — borrowed money — from personal, corporate and governmental finances is expected to take several years, if not a decade, to get back to a more sustainable level.

But progress doesn’t happen at the same pace for all participants in the economy. Individuals have thus far done a better job of reversing the trend of living on the funds of others. In the following two charts from J.P. Morgan’s quarterly Guide to Markets, you can see that personal savings is more than double what it was at its worst in early 2006. In the second chart, you can see that the percentage of personal income used to service debt payments (mortgages, car loans, credit cards, etc.) is near 30-year lows.

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Federal Reserve, J.P. Morgan Asset  Management. Data reflect most recently available as of 12/31/11.

According to this blog post from iShares, using Bloomberg information, since early 2008, U.S. households have eliminated close to $800 billion in debt.

Corporate and government deleveraging has not made the same progress.

While many corporations are operating with the best mix of cash on hand vs. debt that they have ever had, many companies are also strategically taking on more debt, even if they have a stockpile of cash. With interest rates on borrowing being so low, companies are offering bonds with miniscule yields. They figure that they can put the money to use in the operation of their business and earn a much greater return on that capital than it costs them to pay income to the bond holders.

Because of this, the iShares blog indicates that since 2008, corporations have added approximately $500 billion in debt to their balance sheets.

“This half-trillion increase, however, pales in comparison to the debt binge of the federal government. Publically traded or net federal debt has risen by more than $5 trillion since late 2007. As you can see in the chart below, this puts overall U.S. non-financial debt at a bit under $38 trillion (for the purists, this arguably understates the total by $5 trillion as it ignores government debt held by the Social Security Trust Fund).”

Source: The Great Deleveraging Myth http://isharesblog.com/blog/2012/01/16/the-great-deleveraging-myth

Of course, this is just the U.S. picture. Given the similar problems Europe, deleveraging will remain prominent in the vocabulary of economists and market analysts for a very long time.

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

Posted in Financial planning | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Returns of diversified investment portfolios – the mirror effect

Modern Portfolio Theory suggests that diversified investment mixes over time should generate the lowest returns with more conservative allocations to stocks and the highest returns using higher allocations to stocks. Allocations with nearly equal weightings between stocks and bonds should have performance that is between those of the conservative and aggressive mixes. But over the past decade, performance for globally balanced portfolios has not followed expectations.

The following table documents two problems that have come to define investment management in the 21st Century. One is the 10% problem. This refers to an assumption that became well ingrained by the end of the 1990s that even a balanced portfolio of stocks and bonds could produce annual average returns of 10%. From 1973–1999, a balanced mix of 60% global stocks and 40% bonds returned 12.53% per year. Even adding in tougher markets since then, this same balanced mix returned 10.27% per year on average from 1973-2011.

The declining returns represent the second problem—that investors have not been paid well for taking on risk since 2000. You can see in the middle row of the table below that from 2000–2011, the range of returns is backwards of what portfolio theory suggests they should be. The most conservative portfolios – with the least fluctuation of returns – also produced the best average annual returns. The 2011 returns mimicked the now decade-plus pattern.

100% stocks

80% stocks / 20% bonds

60% stocks / 40% bond

40% stocks / 60% bonds

20% stocks / 80% bonds

Average annual return 1973-2011

11.66

11.14

10.27

9.63

8.83

Average annual return 2000-2011

3.81

4.61

5.19

5.57

6.19

2011

-2.09

-0.50

2.26

4.06

6.40

100% stocks = 60% large cap, 10% small cap, 25% international, 5% real estate
80% stocks / 20% bonds = 42% large cap, 11% small cap, 24% international, 5% real estate, 18% bonds
60% stocks / 40% bonds = 32% large cap, 5% small cap, 17% international, 5% real estate, 41% bonds
40% stocks / 60% bonds = 22% large cap, 3% small cap, 12% international, 3% real estate, 59% bonds
20% stocks / 80% bonds = 9% large cap, 2% small cap, 5% international, 1% real estate, 82% bonds
Indexes: Large Cap = S&P 500. Small Cap = Ibbotson & Assoc. 1974-78, Russell 2000 1979-2011. International = MSCI EAFE. Bonds = Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate. REITs = NAREIT Equity REIT Index.

Certainly, most financial plans and pension payment assumptions are calculated using returns better than the 4-6% range that balanced portfolios have provided since 2000. While the returns of these diversified portfolios are sobering, it is helpful to understand that stock market returns in particular have historically provided more support to longer-term financial security.

Consider the table below showing the allocation of returns for the S&P 500 over the past 85 years. The odds are certainly in favor of meaningful stock returns. The most important consideration in taking advantage of the good years is to manage investments so that the impact of the negative markets is reduced.

Source: Russell Investment Group

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

Posted in Financial planning, Investments | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Greece, land of the gods and debt

With all the attention over the past year on Greece and its debt, it’s interesting that a Greek Goddess is now being used to explain a potential outcome for the European economy.

Blackrock, in its 2012 Outlook, described its worst case scenario for this year as follows:

“If the European debt crisis were to spin out of control, it would likely plunge Europe into a deep recession that would spread to the rest of the world, including China. The result would not be a simple addition of problems, but a multiplication. It could be bad because the developed world has used up much of its firepower to fight another credit crunch and deep recession.

We call this scenario Nemesis, after the Greek goddess who wreaks havoc and vengeance on the prideful. Some would argue creating a European Monetary Union without a fiscal union was an act of hubris with punishment long overdue.”

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

Posted in Commentary, Investments | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Savers double up without reward

An addendum to Gary’s News Tribune column from January 6. Cash equivalents may be zombie investments but investors still favor them.

TrimTabs, a tracker of cash flows to bank and investment accounts released information January 13 demonstrating that Americans deposited $889 billion into bank checking and savings accounts from January 2011 through November. That’s more than eight times more than the $109 billion that flowed into stock and bond mutual funds and exchange-traded funds.

In an interview with AdvisorOne, TrimTabs Executive Vice President David Santschi said the bank flows are more than double the $335 billion 12-month average flows since 2000, and closely approach the record flow into savings and checking accounts in the 12 months ended November 2009.

“The Fed is doing almost everything it can to get people to speculate but retail investors aren’t taking the bait,” Santschi said. “If you want to know where the real money is going, it’s all going into savings vehicles.”

More details in this article:

http://www.advisorone.com/2012/01/13/investors-flee-stocks-and-bonds-stuff-cash-in-matt

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

Posted in Financial planning | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Get rid of paper money to fix the economy … ?

Could you operate your financial life without cash in your wallet? Some people already get by without cash, using credit or debit cards for most transactions or even swiping their iPhone to debit an electronic account.

Matthew Yglesias, Slate’s business and economics correspondent, proposes a step further that eliminates cash and charges negative interest rates on savings. In his view, these changes would prohibit recessions.

It’s an interesting read on the Slate web site.

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

Posted in Financial planning | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

U.S. pension plans underfunded by $450 billion

Imagine if you knew you owed a dollar to your friend but you didn’t have to pay it back for 10 years.  Using the time value of money, you could assume an interest rate and then invest some amount (say 60 cents) so you could build up to have that dollar when you needed it.  Now imagine what you would do if you knew that you could only earn half the interest on your 60 cents that you thought that you could. You would have reached 80 cents instead of a dollar. What would you do?

Multiplied to add several zeros, this is the status of the typical U.S. corporate defined benefit pension plan right now according to Bank of New York Mellon.

Corporations contribute assets into the pension plans of their employees each year.  The administrators of these retirement plans use actuarial tables and average investment return scenarios—primarily of high quality bonds—to  project how much they will earn on their pension investments.  They then determine how much they could potentially owe to their pension recipients.  Finally they compare these amounts to determine how much to invest on behalf of each employee to be able to fully fund their expected pension payouts.

At the end of each year, the actuaries review the growth in expected retirement plan payouts and the growth (or loss) of the investments in the plan as well as the new contribution that the company has made to the plan and they determine if the plan is over or under-funded.

Right now, the average corporate defined benefit retirement plan has about 72% of the money that it needs to be fully funded. For companies in the S&P 500 Index that still have pension plans, the funding gap increased from $250 billion to $450 billion in 2011 according to Credit Suisse.

The problem is that most of these pension plan managers expected investment markets, not their contributions, to do the heavy lifting required to fulfill their obligations. Even if they have used a very conservative expected return when making decisions about how much to contribute to their pension plans, the actual rates have been below that.

That means that these plan managers have four basic choices about how to proceed:

  1. Lower their expected market returns for many years and get the leaders of their businesses to approve much higher payments into their retirement plans until these plans are more fully funded. Many publicly-traded U.S. companies are holding record amounts of cash. But investing it in their pension plans prevents them from reinvesting in their business for growth or paying dividends to shareholders.
  2. Hope that market returns increase soon.  At the same time they will also increase the risk that they take with the investments in the plan and hope that their returns will help bring the pension plan liabilities and assets into equilibrium.
  3. Issue bonds to raise money to meet their pension obligations.
  4. Weigh the costs and benefits of continuing to offer a defined benefit plan for employees.  If the costs are too high, they will have to distribute the assets of the underfunded plan to employees so they can be used to fund a defined contribution plan(401k, etc.).

None of these seem very appealing, so our guess is that choice number four will continue to be popular with many companies in the next couple years.

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

Posted in Financial planning, Retirement | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

2012 tax changes and contribution limits

EMPLOYER RETIREMENT PLANS

Participants in employer retirement plans such as 401ks and 403bs will be able to contribute an extra $500 as the limit moves up to $17,000 in 2012. Catch-up contributions, allowed above the $17,000 level for people over age 50, remain at $5,500.

IRA INCOME LIMITS GO UP

Traditional IRA (tax-deductible contributions)

  • Joint tax return filers – $92,000 – $112,000 ($173,000 – $183,000 if your employer does not offer a retirement plan)
  • Singles and head of household – $58,000 – $68,000

Roth IRA (after-tax contributions)

  • Joint tax return filers – $173,000 – $183,000
  • Singles and head of household – $110,000 – $125,000

The amount you can contribute to an IRA has not changed – $5,000/year under age 50, $6,000 50 and over.

ROTH CONVERSIONS

If your income exceeds the limits to make a deductible Traditional IRA or Roth IRA contribution, there is still a way to move money into the tax-free character of the Roth IRA. Again in 2012, there is no income limit for an IRA conversion, moving money from a Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA.

You can make a non-deductible contribution to a Traditional IRA and convert that money to a Roth, paying no taxes. If you have previously existing money in a Traditional IRA that was deductible at the time of contribution, it can be converted to a Roth IRA. You would owe ordinary income tax on the amount converted but future growth in the Roth IRA would be tax free.

SOCIAL SECURITY WAGE BASE

Earned income subject to tax for Social Security increases from $106,800 to $110,100.

TAX BRACKET CHANGES

Revised income ranges for each bracket are largely a function of inflation over the past year. The figures here bump the beginning income for each bracket upward by 2.35-2.43%.

Bracket Married Filing Joint Return

Single

10% $0 – $17,400 $0 – $8,700
15% $17,400 – $70,700 $8,700 – $35,350
25% $70,700 – $142,700 $35,350 – $85,650
28% $142,700 – $217,450 $85,650 – $178,650
33% $217,450 – $388,350 $178,650 – $388,350
35% Over $388,350 Over $388,350

ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES

The exclusion from federal estate tax is increased from $5 million to $5,120,000

The annual exclusion for gifts remains at $13,000 per recipient from any individual. A couple can therefore give $26,000 to any individual.

AMT PATCH

The exemption from Alternative Minimum Tax still awaits its adjustment. This may not be settled by year end.

Many other credits, deductions and phase outs – impacting lifetime learning credits, student loan interest, medical savings accounts and standard deductions – have also been tweaked.

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

Posted in Financial planning, Investments, Taxes | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The global debt web: Who owes who

The BBC has produced an info graphic about the global debt situation that presents the web of how much money is owed by each country to banks in other nations.

We found this interactive graphic to be very helpful in understanding the relationship between individual country debt and the overall risks that could impact the global economy.

Go to the BBC web site to use the debt map and see which countries present the greatest risks. U.S. debt iS also included in the graphic.

It’s worth noting how small the Greek debt is compared to other members of the European Monetary Union. And take a look at the about of debt owed by every Irish citizen compared to other countries. It’s startling.

~ Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

Posted in Investments | Tagged , | Leave a comment