Category Archives: Financial planning

Strategies and tactics to improve the likelihood of achieving your goals.

Personal finance trends – the good and bad

Positive developments in 2013

1)      Lower expense ratios on many Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). Last year, Schwab started the trend of lowering ongoing management fees on their ETFs and eliminating the transaction costs to buy and sell these products on the Schwab platform. This move attracted the attention of competitors and now many ETFs are cheaper to own than ever before. These products allow the broadest diversification across entire market segments at the lowest possible cost.

2)      The government has increased the contribution limits for retirement accounts for the first time since 2008. Annual IRA contributions were bumped up by $500 to $5,500 for people 49 and under and $6,500 for 50 and over investors. Employer retirement plan contributions also increased. Individuals under 50 can contribute $17,500. The over-50 catch up contribution can add another $5,500 to get to $23,000 total.

3)      Congress adopted higher federal estate tax thresholds ($5.25 million per person and $10.5 million per couple in 2013) than expected by most pundits. This effectively eliminates the prospect of paying federal estate tax for 99.86% of estates according to the Tax Policy Center. It also provided much more clarity for estate planning professionals who work with high net worth individuals on estate planning issues. Many states still have lower estate tax thresholds, however. For example, in Washington state the limit is $2 million. If a person dies with an estate value of $1,999,999 no state estate tax is due. But reach $2,000,001 and an estate tax return and payment are necessary.

4)      Investors have returned to markets. According to Leuthold Group, through April 24, net cash flow into mutual funds was at its strongest pace ever with year-to-date positive cash flow $223 billion.

Trends that concern us:

1)      Regarding that cash flow, the point of concern is that $106 billion of the incoming investments have gone to bond mutual funds. We think bonds will be severely challenged to generate meaningful returns over the next several years. Combine the premium many bonds are trading at with current low yields and the fact that total return could turn negative when interest rates rise and particularly U.S. government bonds will struggle to post returns anything like the past decade. By comparison, $22 billion of new investments have entered U.S. stock funds so far this year.

2)      The low interest rate policy set by the Federal Reserve Board. This policy has lowered the borrowing costs for the U.S. Government, but it has also changed the way that we all invest. Bond investors who are searching for yield are taking considerably more investment risk with their fixed income portfolios than ever before. When the Fed finally increases interest rates, three things may happen: inflation could increase dramatically, bond default rates may rise, and returns for bonds could turn negative as investors seek newer bonds at different increasing interest rates.

3)      Less affordable long-term care insurance. A few trends are becoming clearer for the LTC marketplace. A) most residents of nursing homes are women, b) Most baby boomers don’t have long-term care insurance because they either feel that it is too expensive or they don’t think that they will ever need it, C) Rates paid for LTC policies are becoming gender based, and although they have stabilized somewhat in the past year, the combination of the continuation of the low interest rate policies by the federal government and higher claims rates by women will force LTC prices to continue to grow at higher rates than inflation.

~ Allyn Hughes, CFP® — Brooks, Hughes & Jones – Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

www.BHJadvisors.com

If you liked this post, please share it

Questions to ask before making a charitable donation

More than 1.5 million not-for-profits organizations in the U.S. are registered with the IRS as charitable 501(c)(3) entities according to the NCCS Business Master File. In 2010 these nonprofits paid 9.3% of all of the wages paid in the U.S. and had revenues of $1.51 trillion (source: The Nonprofit Almanac, 2012).

Each 501(c)(3) organization has its own mission, leadership and primary funders. Some of these are national organizations that attract large amounts of donations and are very financially secure. Others are “bootstrap” organizations that support a very specific (and often very local) cause. Many of these are close to being financially bankrupt and don’t have the resources necessary to achieve the objectives that their creators have developed for them.

According to the Current Population Survey, completed in September 2010, over 25% of Americans volunteer each year.

Deciding which charitable organization to support with your time, treasure or talents can be a difficult choice. We find that most folks manage their charitable giving in a few different ways.

Some work on the boards or as volunteers of one or more organizations and tend to focus both their time and their money to help support those entities.

Others support a religious organization that is important to them. Sometimes they tithe. Other times they make consistent donations of time and money.

Still others try to spread their charitable dollars around. They often support both local and national organizations that either have asked them for a donation, or that provide a service that they think is valuable.

Finally, quite a few support both local and national charitable objectives by participating in fraternal organizations like Lions, Rotary and Masons.

There is no right way to support an organization.  

In our experience relatively few people have a specific plan to support charities. They tend to make contributions that are proportional to their level of emotional investment in the objectives of the charity. They worry less about how specifically their money will be spent.

Making good decisions about philanthropy

We look at philanthropy the same way we look at investments. We try to understand how the charitable organization is managed, determine what its goals are and better understand how the contribution will be used.

Here are the three questions that we ask when making a donation: 

  • How financially healthy is the charity? To determine this go on to the web and download IRS Form 990 for the charity. The IRS requires each charitable organization to complete form 990 each year. It contains a lot of useful information—the charity’s goals, its income and expenses for the previous year, its leadership and board members and the expenses associated with managing the assets of the charity.
  •  How has the charity spent its donation in the past? The easiest way to determine this is to ask the executive director or lead fundraiser for the charity about how donations have been spent. Were they used to pay the overhead of the management and the fundraisers at the organization? Were they used to fund one or more specific programs? Try to determine the efficiency level of the fundraising efforts for the entity.
  •  How (likely) will my donation be spent? We always try to figure out if a donation will be spent on a specific expense associated with achieving the charity’s mission or if the money will go toward an endowment fund that the charity manages.

Spending the time to get the answers to these three questions will give you a much better idea of the strengths and weaknesses of a charity so you are comfortable that your money is being spent wisely.

~ Allyn Hughes, CFP®, ChFC®, CLU® — Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management – Tacoma, WA

www.BHJadvisors.com

If you liked this post, please share it

Financial fitness from the viewpoint of personal fitness

This post was provoked by a comment I read in a financial industry publication from Stuart Ritter of T. Rowe Price’s retirement services division.

Ritter said “saving 3% for retirement is like going to the gym for six minutes.” Acknowledging low rates of savings for many retirement plan participants, Ritter’s contention is that just as 30 minutes of exercise should be a minimum daily routine, savings for retirement should also be done at five times his example. Instead of saving 3% of annual salary, most people should save 15%.

I think Ritter’s quote goes a bit too far. There are some people who couldn’t manage a decent quality of life (even without living beyond their means) if they deferred 15% of their income into retirement savings. An important thing to consider when determining how much to save for retirement is how much of the heavy lifting you want to rely on investment markets to do and how much of it can you do by managing a prudent financial life that pays yourself first via retirement savings.

If you are saving just 3% of annual income, investment markets will be forced to do much more of the heavy lifting to get you to a point where you can come reasonably close to replacing your earned income in retirement by combining Social Security and withdrawals from investment accounts.

For the dwindling few (mostly government employees) who will receive an employer-funded stream of pension income in retirement, saving just 3% of income in addition to the pension may actually be adequate for living lean in retirement. For the majority, it won’t – especially if the savings is not invested in aggressively enough over the long-term to generate a meaningful rate of return.

Consider if at age 30 – possibly after paying off student loans and saving for a down payment on a home, a couple (or even a single wage earner) make $80,000 per year and their income grows at 2.5% per year. If they saved 3% of income in a pre-tax employer retirement plan and earned a 7% average annual investment return for 35 years, retiring at 65, they would have $473,846 of savings. This balance, assuming it continued to earn 7% returns for 30 years of retirement could reasonably be expected to generate approximately $1,400 per month of inflation-adjusted after-tax income to age 95. Add that to the average Social Security benefit and the couple (or individual) has to learn to live on a lot less than while they were working.

I think a more prudent minimum retirement savings is 10% of annual income. Apply the same scenario as before with 10% savings (perhaps through both personal and employer match contributions) and the balance after 35 years is $1,457,633 pre-tax. It would have about a 70% probability of supporting  $4,400 per month of after-tax spending for 30 years to age 95.

Of course, many people can’t afford to save 10% of their annual income early in their career but they expect to increase their contributions over time. What if someone upped their retirement plan contribution by 1% every two years. They start at 3% for two years, then 4% for two years and so on until they reach 15% of their income for the final 10 years of their career. Would they ever catch up to the person who saved 10% throughout? No. Even though they would have contributed approximately $58,000 more dollars to the retirement plan, saving much more during the peak earnings years, they would end up a bit less than $200,000 behind the consistent 10% saver. This is due to the missed opportunity to have more money growing and compounding returns in the early years.

While saving just 3% of income for retirement won’t sustain the same standard of living as pre-retirement, saving 15% throughout a career could be oversaving for some people, sacrificing a little bit too much today for the opportunity to use it in retirement.

The most important point is to take the time (or hire an independent financial advisor) to determine what amount of savings you will likely need to live on in retirement. This will inform your level of needed savings throughout the remainder of your working life and also be a guide for the appropriate investment strategy.

  • What can you do to increase your rate of savings in retirement plans?
  • Do you know how much money you need to save today to replace your income in retirement?

~ Gary Brooks, CFP® – Brooks, Hughes & Jones – Partners in Wealth Management – Tacoma, WA

www.BHJadvisors.com

If you liked this post, please share it

Important College Financial Aid Tips

For those of you with college-age kids or kids who will soon be in college, one of the annual rights of passage is the completion of the Federal government’s “FASFA” (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) form. For many, this form should be completed as early in February as possible.

The information on the FASFA is used by college financial aid offices to determine how much the expected contribution towards annual college costs should be from the family (parents and child(ren)) and how much should come in the form of scholarships, grants and loans. This information is presented in snapshot format — it measures all assets and debts as of the date that it is completed.

Even if you don’t expect to qualify for much aid, the FAFSA process is necessary to be eligible for Stafford Loans (for the student) or PLUS loans (for the parents.)

Mark Kantrowitz, the publisher of Fastweb and FinAid, recently made a presentation to financial advisors about some of the techniques that parents could use to lower the “expected family contribution” (EFC) towards college costs from parents. His talk included these strategies:

  • Minimize income. Parents should work to minimize their income during the base year (the year before their oldest child goes to college) and the other years that they have children in college. This can be done by deferring income (perhaps into your employer retirement plan) or avoiding taxable distributions from retirement plan and using capital losses to offset taxable capital gains where possible.
  • Actively reduce reportable assets. The FASFA form looks at the parent’s income, savings, taxable investments, trust assets, 529 or Coverdell Education savings accounts and value of any business holdings. It also asks for the total savings of the student. It does not look at the value of the parent’s home, the assets in retirement accounts or their debt. Because of this, parents who want to minimize their EFC should use assets in savings or other taxable investment accounts to pay down loans, credit card balances or mortgages and lines of credit before completing FASFA.  They should also work to maximize their retirement plan contributions for those years. Finally, it is better to save in the parent’s name and not the name of their child because a much smaller percentage of the parent’s assets are counted towards the EFC than the child’s assets.
  • Spend down assets smartly. Parents should spend down the assets of the child (buy buying computers for college or other supplies for the child) before they file the FASFA. This will lower the expected contribution rate of the child.
  • Maximize student overlap. The EFC for a family is reduced if more than one child is in college. This is the one case where it pays to have triplets.

For more information on FASFA, see the fastweb website at this link: http://www.fastweb.com/content/fafsa

  • How are you saving for college expenses?
  • What has your experience been like dealing with financial aid offices?

~ Allyn Hughes CFP®, ChFC®, CLU® — Brooks, Hughes & Jones – Partners in Wealth Management – Tacoma, WA

www.BHJAdvisors.com

If you liked this post, please share it

The college tuition hurdle gets higher

FrugalDad.com compiled this infographic that summarizes the growing expense of paying for an education.

Washington state colleges have contributed to the problem as the state legislature has allowed state universities to raise tuition over the past four years by 13.1%, 13.1%, 19% and 16%. That means every $1,000 of tuition from the 2008-09 school year now costs $1,766.

And now, Washington legislators are seriously considering the closure of the Guaranteed Education Tuition (GET) program.

College Isn't Cheap

~ Gary Brooks, CFP® – Brooks, Hughes & Jones — Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

www.BHJadvisors.com

If you liked this post, please share it

Federal budget issues on deck

This article from Charles Schwab’s Washington expert Michael Townsend and Director of Income Planning Rob Williams provides a good outline of the debt ceiling and other upcoming federal negotiations and how they may impact markets and retirement income.

There are three deadlines looming. How well, or not, Congress and President Obama work together, will likely dictate movement in stock and bond markets over the next several weeks.

Topics covered include:

  • Impact of default or debt downgrade
  • Debt ceiling debate is about more than just default
  • Debt downgrade more about politics
  • Downgrade could have spillover effects
  • Tax-exempt status of muni bonds
  • Interest-rate impacts on bonds
  • Low interest rates hurt retirees
  • Bonds or bond funds?

~ Gary Brooks, CFP(r) — Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management — Tacoma, WA

www.BHJadvisors.com

 

If you liked this post, please share it

Tax law changes for 2013 eliminate uncertainty

The last few weeks have been difficult for the American consumer.  Constant bickering about the “fiscal cliff” and unknown changes in the personal financial landscape made it difficult for the average American to make proactive decisions about his or her financial future.

On January 1st the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) was passed. Certain provisions of it have answered some of our questions about areas of tax policy that have been very unclear to us.  Here is a list of five tax issues that now have some clarity:

1)      Estate taxes – The 2012 estate tax laws, which provided for a $5 million (indexed) estate tax exemption for each spouse in a marriage, were supposed to sunset back to $1 million on January 1, 2013.  ATRA made these exemptions permanent so the $5.12 million (2012) estate tax exemption will continue for each spouse.   Maybe more importantly, new exemption portability rules allow the unused estate tax exemption of a deceased spouse to be used by the living spouse.  This will reduce the requirements for bypass trusts for all but a few very wealthy families.

2)      Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) – For many years congress has had to pass a new law each year to patch the inequalities of the AMT so that most tax filers would not have to pay taxes at the higher AMT rates.  ATRA created a more permanent fix for this issue by creating an AMT exemption of $78,750 for married couples and $50,600 for singles.  This fix is retroactive back to 2012, and is indexed for inflation, so relatively few Americans will be subject to AMT in the future.

3)      Tax Rates – For married couples with joint incomes of $450,000 or individuals with incomes of $400,000 per year, income above these amounts will be subject to a new marginal tax rate of 39.6%. This is the same highest tax rate as during the Clinton administration.  There is still a 35% tax rate in effect – it is just for a very small tax bracket as it only applies to income levels of $388,350 to $450,000 for married filing jointly tax payers.

Tax payers in this highest tax bracket also will pay higher long-term capital gains tax rates (20% instead of 15% of the gain).  Their qualified dividend income will also be taxed at 20% rather than 15%.  Finally, this group will also be subject to a new 3.8% Medicare tax on their net investment income, so the tax rates for qualified dividends and long-term capital gains will be 23.8%.

4)      Deduction phaseout – The itemized deduction phaseout will return for 2013.  For married couples with Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) of $300,000 or individuals with AGI of $250,000 (indexed for inflation), the phase out for itemized deductions is 3% of income over this threshold.

5)      Personal Exemption Phaseout – For taxpayers with the same AGIs as 4) above, the phaseout of the personal exemption is 2% of the total exemption for every $2,500 of excess income over these thresholds.  So if a married couple filing jointly had an income of $400,000 then 80% of their personal exemption would be phased out for that year.

~ Allyn Hughes, CFP®, ChFC®, CLU® — Brooks, Hughes & Jones – Partners in Wealth Management, Tacoma, WA

www.BHJadvisors.com

 

If you liked this post, please share it

Retirement decisions timeline

Age 49 and under. 401K contributions are limited to $17,500 in 2013. Traditional IRA and Roth IRA contributions limits are $5,500.

The income limit (AGI) for contribution to a Roth IRA in 2013 has a phaseout range from $178,000 to $188,000 for married-filing-jointly taxpayers and $112,000 to $127,000 for single taxpayers.

The income limit to make a tax-deductible contribution to a Traditional IRA in 2013 has a phaseout range from $95,000 to $115,000 for married filing jointly (if covered by an employer retirement plan also) and $59,000 to $69,000 for singles. If you are not covered by an employer retirement plan, tax-deductible contributions can be made up to $178,000 of AGI for married filers.

Age 50 and over. 401K contributions are limited to $23,000 with catch up provision. IRA or Roth IRA contributions levels are $6,500 with catch up provision.

Age 55. If you leave your job after age 55, you can begin to take 401K distributions from your former employer’s plan without paying any penalties. Income tax will still be due on the amount of the distribution.

Age 59½. Distributions from IRAs may be made without penalty. Income tax will still be due.

Age 61. Think about when you want to retire and determine when you want to start receiving Social Security if you will be eligible for it. The most likely reasons to start receiving it are: lack of employment or under-employment, lack of income from investments, or a shorter-than-average life expectancy.

Age 62. Eligibility for Social Security begins. The Social Security Administration no longer sends an annual estimate of your expected benefits. You will have to access the estimate at www.ssa.gov. Your Social Security benefit will be permanently reduced by 25-30% if you begin payments at 62 instead of your Full Retirement Age (FRA). Keep in mind that starting Social Security early may also reduce benefits available to your spouse by as much as 35%. And if you continue to work while you receive Social Security, your benefits will be reduced by one dollar for every two dollars you earn over $15,120 in 2013.If you were born on January 1st, you should refer to the previous year.

  1. If you were born on the 1st of the month, we figure your benefit (and your full retirement age) as if your birthday was in the previous month. If you were born on January 1st, we figure your benefit (and your full retirement age) as if your birthday was in December of the previous year.
  2. You must be at least 62 for the entire month to receive benefits.
  3. Percentages are approximate due to rounding.
  4. The maximum benefit for the spouse is 50% of the benefit the worker would receive at full retirement age. The % reduction for the spouse should be applied after the automatic 50% reduction. Percentages are approximate due to rounding.

Age 65. Medicare eligibility begins. From three months before you turn 65 to three months after you turn 65 you may sign up for Medicare Parts A, B and D. Sign up for Medicare Part D (prescriptions) from October 15 until December 7. If you (or your spouse) are covered by an employer-paid health plan, you have eight months after you retire before you will have to pay a penalty to join Medicare.

Age 66 or 67. Considered Full Retirement Age (FRA) for Social Security recipients. If you were born before 1954, you are eligible at age 66. From 1955 to 1959, your FRA increases from 66 years and 2 months to 66 years and 10 months. If you were born in 1960 or later, the FRA is 67. At FRA you can still continue to work without receiving reduced Social Security benefits.

Age 70. Last year to receive deferral credit for postponing receipt of Social Security benefits. There is no reason not to take Social Security at this point. If you continue to work, and your earnings are higher than previous inflation-adjusted earnings, your Social Security benefit will continue to be increased even if you are already receiving it.

The year you reach 70½. (Or, more precisely, April 1st after the year that you turn age 70 ½). Distributions from IRAs, and other tax-deferred retirement plans like 401K and 457 plans (except Roth IRAs) must be started. The distribution amount will be determined by dividing the total value of all tax-deferred retirement accounts as of the previous December 31 by your life expectancy using IRS tables. If you fail to take this distribution, or your distribution amount is less than the minimum required, the tax penalty is 50% of the amount you failed to remove from the account.

~ Allyn Hughes, CFP, CLU, ChFC — Brooks, Hughes & Jones, Partners in Wealth Management — Tacoma, WA

If you liked this post, please share it